An entelechy can be defined as a paradox: the unreality of something that can never be compared to the reality of the fact (what from itself and through its action is possible).
Without forgetting the first, I have always preferred and chosen the second as the motor of my life, thus the works that I call entelequias
they are routes, journeys; steps that in themselves, in their potentiality, contain the entire path and that constitute vehicular objects that transport me. Metaphors of the journey and of the space in which it takes place and that I envisioned, projected and began as the object of my life, so that it would be, until the end, according to that purpose: that what is contained between the beginning and the end (the sum of everything that makes up distance, which, stage by stage, record by record, through the sum of each and every one of the steps that have been and continue to be necessary, preserves and encloses existence) was the result of that first desire. entelequias
they originate as intuition (as the still unreal object of desire) and conclude as a real fact.